Powered by Twitter.com. See the tips archive here.
Powered by www.flickr.com. See the photo archive here.
Notice: This website, specifically this post, and the views contained may not necessarily be the views of the author's employers, friends or family.

O’Reilly vs. Moore

…Game. Set. Match…O’Reilly.

If you haven’t seen this interview or if you don’t regularly watch the O’Reilly Factor, then you missed a really good interview. Before anyone moans or anything about what I’m about to say…let me get this out of the way. I like Michael Moore as a film maker, he just goes too far sometimes in his views, and that tends to annoy me a tad bit. As far as O’Reilly, I like his show. I don’t watch it regularly, but when I do see it, it is always interesting. So I came into watching this interveiw decidedly down the middle. And from that standpoint, I can say O’Reilly really won this battle.

See for yourself (You need Windows Media Player to watch…suck!). Anyway. If you agree or disagree, let me know in the comments.

  • Mike
    Seemed to me that Moore was the one back peddling and not answering questions. Moore never really did give a solid answer about how exactly why he thinks Bush lied about the weapons of mass descrution, even though Moore admits that Bush got faulty information...
  • christien
    you.re wrong. o'reilly came off looking like an idiot and basically decided to 'agree to disagree'. that man needs to get a real job...
blog comments powered by Disqus