<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hell Yeah Bitch! .com &#187; ugly sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hellyeahbitch.com/tag/ugly-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hellyeahbitch.com</link>
	<description>Blog Boosh!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 09:15:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>So everyone hates the new design&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://hellyeahbitch.com/2005/12/13/700/</link>
		<comments>http://hellyeahbitch.com/2005/12/13/700/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 04:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ugly sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://testing.hellyeahbitch.com/?p=700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve been hearing on and off-line, pretty much everyone hates the new design.</p>
<p>It will be changed.</p>
<p>But first, let me explain what I was going for.  What I wanted to do with the site was make it cleaner and dare I say it, more professional.  Lately we&#8217;ve been seeing some good linking from some fairly big sites and I felt the old design looked a little too &#8220;this is my blog, I live somewhere hip and talk about how much I love Coldplay&#8221;-ish.  So I wanted something a bit harder.</p>
<p>Here are the main complaints I&#8217;ve heard thus far:<br />
1. Its ugly.<br />
2. Its better when you can read most of the articles in full on the front page.<br />
3. People don&#8217;t understand the picture on the right.</p>
<p>Here are my answers:<br />
1. Ok.  I see your point.  But I&#8217;ve always been searching for something between too flashy and too straight and narrow.  I want it to have a feel like a on-line magazine, but its tough when you have serious content limitations.  Seriously, I&#8217;m open to suggestions.</p>
<p>2. The reason I went with the summary of the articles on the front page was simple.  It was just easier to manage.  When I had the full articles on there before that left column got long fast and made the right column look really stubby.  Maybe a compromise of longer summaries?  Or is everyone rock hard and having 5 full articles on the front page at all times?</p>
<p>3. The picture on the right is just that.  I wanted something where any of the writers here could post of a picture with a caption.  Sometimes I run articles that are really just pictures, this way I could still show them but not have it take up a whole article space.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m moving back to the old design for now, but the hated newer design will still be up at: <a href="http://hellyeahbitch.com/ugly">hellyeahbitch.com/ugly</a>  Obviously, I need help so any suggestions are welcome.  Don&#8217;t expect anything new for a week or so though, I&#8217;m already stressed out about me moving this week and today I found out my bills are shooting up higher than I thought, so assuming I don&#8217;t kill someone or shave my head and join the Peace Corps, something new will be done in a few weeks most likely.  Maybe around the new year.</p>
<p>Seriously though, if you guys didn&#8217;t (or did) like the new design, I&#8217;m going to need comments to fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hellyeahbitch.com/2005/12/13/700/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

